More Exciting than War and simultaneously More Regenerative than Peace

_ I have compared Meshtastic BBS (TC²-BBS) practicality using LongFast, MediumSlow and MediumFast at SE Portland residential area.

_ I thought LongFast had advantages because of reach and other nodes hop.

_ Actually LS was about 0.5 miles practical distance and MS was about 0.9 -1.0 miles practical distance.

_ Antenna was original and hight was first floor.

_ That means typical one neighborhood in SE can be covered by one or two BBS nodes.

_ I also noticed when I used my BBS, the channel utilization went to 30-32% using LF. 15-17% using MS.

_ MF was about 0.8-0.9 miles practical distance. I also noticed when I used my BBS, the channel utilization went to 3.3% using MF.

_ LF 0.5-0.8 miles-30-32% util

MS 0.9-1.0 miles -15-17% util

MF 0.8-0.9 miles - 3.3-3.4 % util

_ LF is about 55 active nodes in two hours means about 15-20 % ch util usually. MS and MF both are pretty empty here.

_ All testing points are very few. So this results are just rough impressions base.

_ I noticed LF sometimes need long waiting time to see responses from BBS.

_ BBS medium fast East direction test util 3-7%

_ 0.7 miles mf was ok. You need more multiple attempts to just angle etc.

_ 0.6 miles east mf is more practical bbs use distance

_ 0.4 miles is easy. The device can stay inside of my car.